Green Bonds: Moving Beyond the Initial Hype

The euphoria surrounding the early years of what was then a new and promising asset class has now faded. We revisit the hurdles that have since emerged to investing in green bonds as an asset class and highlight how rethinking Green bond portfolio construction can help unlock the full potential we believe this asset class offers.

Looking Back

The early days: from strength to strength

The 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change was a catalyst for rapid expansion of the green bond market. Consequently, issuance volume doubled every year, consistently surpassing previous records.

By 2021, the green bond market had become less concentrated and more liquid. Not only had it reached a critical size, depth, and granularity, it had garnered strong investor appetite by offering transparency and impact measurability – all at a time when bond yields were close to zero.

Reality check

Enter the rates shock of 2022, in which rapidly rising interest rates severely impacted bond markets, hitting duration heavy portfolios even harder. Coupled with acute credit spread widening, it was the perfect storm to shake up traditional benchmarked green bond strategies. 

This may have resulted in something of a wake-up call for sustainability investors as focus around impact credibility gave way to greater scrutiny around performance. This did not help to dissipate the misconceptions that investing in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) strategies might imply sacrificing financial returns. The subsequent underperformance of sustainable equity strategies versus large technology stocks certainly failed to shake this narrative as well.

A new chapter

One cannot ignore that the sentiment around ESG investing seems to have shifted since the early days – ESG fatigue appears to have set in no doubt influenced by regulatory burdens, reporting complexity, and backlash in the US. Meanwhile, flows into SFDR Article 9 funds have declined in recent years.1

Yet if we fail to look beyond the surface, are we missing out on a prime opportunity at a time when diversified Fixed Income has become increasingly attractive?

[1] Morningstar – How SFDR 2.0 Could Reshape ESG Fund Flows.

Important information

Please note that articles may contain technical language. For this reason, they may not be suitable for readers without professional investment experience. Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice. The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns. Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment risk: The lack of common or harmonised definitions and labels integrating ESG and sustainability criteria at EU level may result in different approaches by managers when setting ESG objectives. This also means that it may be difficult to compare strategies integrating ESG and sustainability criteria to the extent that the selection and weightings applied to select investments may be based on metrics that may share the same name but have different underlying meanings. In evaluating a security based on the ESG and sustainability criteria, the Investment Manager may also use data sources provided by external ESG research providers. Given the evolving nature of ESG, these data sources may for the time being be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable. Applying responsible business conduct standards in the investment process may lead to the exclusion of securities of certain issuers. Consequently, (the Sub-Fund’s) performance may at times be better or worse than the performance of relatable funds that do not apply such standards.

Back to Top