ELTIF 2.0: Investing in private credit through open-ended funds

In this paper, we discuss the amended regulation on European Long-Term Investment Funds (ELTIF 2.0), the latest evolution of EU Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs). The first version of this fund structure was introduced in 2015 and aimed to finance the real economy by channelling non-bank capital to long-term infrastructure projects and SMEs [1].  

The ELTIF 2.0 regulation creates new opportunities to invest in private assets using an open-ended fund structure, aiming to help democratise investments.

This regulation includes several changes relative to its predecessor, ELTIF 1.0, and in our view establishes the ideal environment for strategies with allocations to private assets.

Several of these changes aim to facilitate access for retail investors to private assets, for example, by explicitly differentiating between ELTIFs for professional and for retail investors, with lower barriers and fewer constraints to investing, and by allowing these ELTIFs to be structured as open-ended funds.

The new regulation also has a significant impact on the structuring and distribution of funds incorporating private credit strategies.

In our paper, we discuss the new directive and the additional investment opportunities it brings, with a particular focus on private credit..

Private credit investments

We begin with a review of the risks and returns associated with private credit investments, the benefits of integrating private credit into multi-asset funds, and the strategic considerations underpinning investments in funds with private credit exposure.

The Global Financial Crisis of 2008 served as a catalyst for the rapid expansion of private credit markets, reshaping the financing landscape and driving increased interest in alternative lending channels.

We discuss the sources of risk and return from investing in private credit including the illiquidity risk premium, the duration risk premium, the role of leverage in private credit investments and its potential to augment returns, and how private credit strategies offer opportunities for return smoothing and consistent income generation.

We see an investment case for investing in open-ended funds that include private credit as a core component. The benefits include enhanced risk-adjusted returns.

The benefits of investments in private credit

  • Higher gross yield: private credit has a higher gross yield compared to high-yield bonds with the same rating, supported by the yield premium that private credit offers
  • Lower credit loss: private credit investments come with structural features (e.g., covenants) that provide more downside protection and higher recovery rates than traditional unsecured bonds with the same rating
  • Lower volatility: private credit has less price volatility than high-yield bonds, providing more stable returns over the longer term
  • Diversification: private credit is less correlated with traditional asset classes such as equity and bonds. It provides diversification by reducing volatility and increasing returns in a traditional portfolio. 

References

[1] Small and medium-sized enterprises 

Important information

Please note that articles may contain technical language. For this reason, they may not be suitable for readers without professional investment experience. Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice. The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns. Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.

Back to Top